Breast or Bottom man?
What is attractive and what isn’t may be defined by culture. British culture at the moment seem to idolize big breasts on tall, slender figures (a combination I have read that is almost never found in nature).
In Brazil, breasts take a backseat to a woman’s bottom. In South American culture, pert and round buttocks are far more attractive to men than breasts so I have heard.
But during the 16th century, big breasts were considered low-class. The standard belle in the 1700s would be considered overweight today – but back then, carrying a few extra pounds was a sign of wealth (that you got enough to eat). But these neoclassical beauties had relatively small breasts – a modest B cup at most. Have you ever seen ancient Greek or Roman sculptures at the museum? You may recall that even the goddess of love, Aphrodite/Venus, wasn’t burdened with cleavage. These ancient beauties were instead well-proportioned with breasts that fit their frames. 
And it’s not just breast size standards that change over time. Remember Michaelangelo’s famous sculpture David? The reason the statue doesn’t have a larger penis is because, in Renaissance Italy, having a big penis was a cause for embarassment. In that time and place, being over-generously hung was about as attractive as wearing a red clown nose.
- Harem of beauties

